TRIAL COURT DEPARTED FROM ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAW IN ABATING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD-PARTY BAD FAITH CLAIM INSTEAD OF DISMISSING IT.

TRIAL COURT DEPARTED FROM ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAW IN ABATING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD-PARTY BAD FAITH CLAIM INSTEAD OF DISMISSING IT.

Geico v. Martinez, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D86 (Fla. 3rd DCA January 3, 2018):

The plaintiff in this case sued the defendant driver and Geico insured when Geico refused to pay its $10,000 policy limits in the case. While the case was pending, the plaintiff filed a motion to amend her complaint to add Geico as a party defendant to the action, and to add a third-party bad faith claim against Geico. When Geico moved to dismiss, the plaintiff conceded that the bad faith claim was premature pursuant to the non-joinder statute, but asked the trial court to abate the action awaiting resolution of the underlying case, which it did.

The appellate court reversed. Pursuant to the non-joinder statute (section 627.4136), there must be a verdict or a settlement against the insured before the insurer may be added to the case. Thus, abatement was improper and the trial court should have dismissed the claim altogether

Marco Island Office

Map & Directions | Email Us

651 South Collier Blvd., Suite 2H
Marco Island, FL 34145
239-430-0001 fax 239-430-0002

JoomShaper